Process improvement principles
- Map a process before you try to improve it — you can't optimise what you haven't defined
- High frequency + high time cost = the biggest ROI opportunities for automation
- Approval bottlenecks are often solved with clearer criteria, not more automation
- If fewer than two people could run a process from scratch, it's a knowledge risk — document it now
What a process audit actually measures
Most businesses run dozens of recurring processes — invoicing, onboarding, reporting, approvals — without ever formally evaluating them. This audit scores a process across two key dimensions: how healthy it already is, and how much it would benefit from automation.
A process can score low on health but low on automation opportunity (e.g., it's a rare, complex task). Or it can score high on both — which is your ideal automation target. The combination of scores tells you not just what to fix, but how to fix it.
Understanding your scores
Automation Opportunity: Driven by frequency, headcount, error rate, time per run, data entry, and approval delays. A high score means this process has the right characteristics for automation to deliver real, measurable time savings.
Process Health: Driven by documentation quality, input standardisation, tool integration, and team satisfaction. A low health score means the process has foundational problems that automation alone won't fix — and may actually make worse.
Overall Efficiency: An average across all dimensions. This gives a single number for comparing multiple processes in a prioritisation exercise.
Frequently asked questions
Should I automate a process before fixing it?
What's the difference between process improvement and automation?
How often should I audit my business processes?
Automate your processes with Claipot
Claipot helps you identify, prioritise, and implement automation across your business — without needing a developer or a big budget.
Try Claipot free